RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05917
COUNSEL: NONE
XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His records be corrected to reflect that he attained the grade
of staff sergeant (SSgt, E-5).
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Documents showing he satisfactorily held the grade of SSgt are
not available or were destroyed.
The applicant provides no documents in support of his request.
His complete submission is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
In a letter to the applicant dated 13 Feb 2013, ARPC/DPTT
invited the applicant to provide additional documentation
showing that he satisfactorily held the grade of SSgt.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of
the Air Force at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
ARPC/DPPT recommends denial. DPPT states that a review of all
available military records show the highest grade held by the
applicant was that of senior airman (SrA, E-4). This grade was
determined when he was transferred to the Retired Reserve
effective 16 Mar 1999. There is no documentation that shows he
ever held the grade of SSgt.
The complete DPTT evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 3 May 2013, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded
to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. As of
this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit
D).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not
been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application
in Executive Session on 27 Aug 2013, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-
2012-05917:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 20 Dec 2012.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Available Military Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, ARPC/DPTT, dated 30 Apr 2013, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 3 May 2013.
Acting Panel Chair
2
2
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02189
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ ARPC/DPPT recommends denial, stating, in part, based on the facts provided, the applicant made an irrevocable RCSBP election for Option B, "Deferred Annuity for Child Only" as prescribed by law U.S.C. In accordance with Title 10, U.S.C., Section 1448 the RCSBP election is irrevocable if not revoked before the end of the 90- day period unless there is a life changing event. As of this date, no response...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00500
His date of separation at the time of discharge is not correctly annotated in his records. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. There is insufficient documentation to support...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC 2006 00500
His date of separation at the time of discharge is not correctly annotated in his records. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. There is insufficient documentation to support...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00656
On 27 May 07, the applicant and service member were married. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPT recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. A complete copy of the ARPC/DPPT evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: They...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02785
Section 12731 to allow members to reduce theirretired pay age of 60 by 3 months for each aggregate of 90 days of qualifying active duty service fiscal year. A review of the applicantÂ’s record shows he turns 60 on 14 March2019 and would normally be entitled to draw Reserve retired payon that date. The complete DPPT evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 30 August 2012, for...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00640
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00640 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to show that he elected Option C (Immediate Annuity), under the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP), for spouse and child coverage, based on full retired pay. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 03412
DPTT has no record of ever receiving her election form. To date, a response has not been received (Exhibit C). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02170
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02170 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive credit for all or some of the period served in Inactive Status List Reserve Section (ISLRS) to adjust his Total Federal Commissioned Service Date (TFCSD) and Mandatory Separation Date (MSD). The AFBCMR Legal Advisor recommends the Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03156
The decedent did not elect to participate during this Open Season. In view of the above, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. You have the right to submit newly discovered relevant evidence for consideration by the Board.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05449
At the time of his discharge, the applicant had 19 years and 7 months of satisfactory service towards meeting the qualifications for Reserve retired pay. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the applicant's contention that because of his inability to complete drills he was 5 months short of completing 20 years of service when he was discharged; we are not persuaded his discharge was in error or unjust. ...